Mechanical & Procedural Complications of Ventricular Septal Defect Repair: A Systematic Review
Keywords:
Ventricular septal defect, VSD repair, Transcatheter closure, Surgical repair, Procedural complications, Mechanical complicationsAbstract
Background: Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is the most common congenital cardiac anomaly and remains a major contributor to the global burden of congenital heart disease. It may present as an isolated defect or as part of complex syndromes and can also occur secondary to acquired conditions. Both genetic predisposition and environmental exposures during foetal development significantly influence its occurrence and anatomical complexity. Despite advances in surgical techniques and transcatheter device technologies, VSD closure continues to be associated with clinically relevant mechanical and procedural complications.
Objective: To systematically evaluate the evidence on mechanical and procedural complications associated with surgical and transcatheter VSD repair.
Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched from inception to January 2026. Studies reporting mechanical or procedural complications after surgical or transcatheter VSD repair were included. Data were extracted for study characteristics, patient demographics, VSD type, interventions, and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and QUADAS-2, and findings were synthesised narratively due to study heterogeneity.
Results: A total of 140 studies met the inclusion criteria. Mechanical complications included residual shunts, atrioventricular conduction abnormalities, valvular injury, ventricular rupture, and haemolysis. Procedural complications comprised device embolisation, arrhythmias, vascular access complications, re-intervention, and procedure-related mortality. Complication profiles varied based on repair modality, defect characteristics, and patient population.
Conclusion: Mechanical and procedural complications remain significant following VSD repair. Improved procedural strategies and standardised reporting are essential to optimise clinical outcomes.
Downloads
References
1. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10(3):157-68.
2. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(3):407-77.
3. Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, Amsterdam E, Bhatt DL, Birtcher KK, et al. 2021 AHA/ACC guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain. Circulation. 2021;144(22):e368-54.
4. Pontone G, Andreini D, Guaricci AI, Baggiano A, Fazzari F, Guglielmo M, et al. Incremental diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography with stress myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(16):2011-23.
5. Nørgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, Seneviratne S, Ko BS, Ito H, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(18):2123-34.
6. Underwood SR, Anagnostopoulos C, Cerqueira M, Ell PJ, Flint EJ, Harbinson M, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(12):1341-52.
7. Dweck MR, Joshi NV, Newby DE, Fayad ZA. Noninvasive imaging in coronary artery disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15(4):203-18.
8. Fratz S, Chung T, Greil GF, Samyn MM, Taylor AM, Valsangiacomo Buechel ER, et al. Guidelines and protocols for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018;20(1):1-23.
9. Rajiah P, Saboo SS, Abbara S, Halliburton S. Cardiac MR imaging in congenital heart disease. Radiographics. 2019;39(6):1747-68.
10. Oikonomou EK, Antoniades C. Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17(12):745-60
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rajkumar G, Mathew Lemuel N, Yamini B (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
