Pharmacological Considerations in Diagnostic Radiology: Contrast Agents, Adverse Reactions, Drug–Imaging Interactions, And Patient Safety.

Authors

  • Guru Prakash D Assistant Professor, Department of MRIT, School of Allied Health Sciences, Vinayaka Mission’s Puducherry Campus, Puducherry, India. Author
  • Joel Martin J Assistant Professor, Department of MRIT, School of Allied Health Sciences, Vinayaka Mission’s Puducherry Campus, Puducherry, India. Author
  • Dr Naveenkumar M Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Vinayaka Mission’s Puducherry Campus, Puducherry, India. Author
  • Govindaraj S Assistant Professor, Department of MRIT, School of Allied Health Sciences, Vinayaka Mission’s Puducherry Campus, Puducherry, India. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67920/jahcri.2026.16

Keywords:

Diagnostic Radiology, Contrast Media, Ultrasound Contrast Agents, Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents, Iodinated Contrast Media

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced imaging is a pharmacological intervention as well as an imaging procedure. Iodinated contrast media (ICM), gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), and ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) differ substantially in molecular structure, physicochemical behaviour, biodistribution, clearance, dose-response relationships, and adverse-event profiles. These differences influence how patients should be screened, how agents should be selected, and how repeated examinations should be scheduled. This structured narrative review synthesises contemporary evidence, emphasising guidance and peer-reviewed studies published predominantly from 2021 through August 2026. PubMed/MEDLINE was used for primary bibliographic verification, while Scopus and Google Scholar were used for broader discovery and citation tracking, and ResearchGate was used only as a supplementary full-text discovery source. The review focuses on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics; immediate and delayed hypersensitivity; contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI); iodine-related thyroid dysfunction; nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF); gadolinium retention; UCA safety; drug–contrast issues, including metformin and laboratory-test interference; extravasation; special populations; and pharmacovigilance. Current evidence favours risk-adapted contrast administration rather than routine contrast avoidance. The clinically important determinants of risk are patient-specific: prior reaction phenotype, kidney function and active acute kidney injury, haemodynamic status, thyroid susceptibility, pregnancy or childhood, concomitant medications, exposure frequency, and the diagnostic necessity of enhancement. Major contemporary guidance also shows that some historical practices require reconsideration, particularly routine premedication and indiscriminate withholding of contrast in chronic kidney disease. The principal contribution of this review is to integrate pharmacology with radiological decision-making in a practical framework that links agent properties to individualised risk, prevention, emergency readiness, and future precision contrast administration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Vega F. Adverse reactions to radiological contrast media: prevention and treatment. Radiologia (Engl Ed). 2024;66(Suppl 2):S98-S109. doi:10.1016/j.rxeng.2024.03.012. PMID:39603745.

2. Wang C, Ramsey A, Lang D, et al. Management and Prevention of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Radiocontrast Media: A Consensus Statement From the American College of Radiology and the AAAAI. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2025;13(5):1029-1047. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2025.01.04 2. PMID:40332064.

3. Mervak BM, McDonald JS. Iodine and Gadolinium Contrast Reactions: What Is the Risk and Role of Premedication, Abbreviated Protocols, Prior History of Reactions, and Cross-Reactivity? Radiol Clin North Am. 2024;62(6):949-957. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2024.02.014. PMID:39393853.

4. Huang W, He C, Chen Y, et al. Risk factors associated with immediate hypersensitivity reaction to contrast media: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2026;194:112472. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112472. PMID:41175815.

5. van der Molen AJ, Dekkers IA, Geenen RWF, et al. Waiting times between examinations with intravascularly administered contrast media: a review of contrast media pharmacokinetics and updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines. Eur Radiol. 2024;34(4):2512-2523. doi:10.1007/s00330-023-10085-5. PMID:37823923.

6. Vemireddy L, Bansal S. Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: Definitions, Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Implications. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2023;12(4):489-498. doi:10.1016/j.iccl.2023.06.007. PMID:37673493.

7. Mahgoub M, Fan J, Concepcion L, et al. Current updates in radiocontrast-associated acute kidney injury. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024;37(6):938-944. doi:10.1080/08998280.2024.2395765. PMID:39440097.

8. Kasabali A, Mehta A. Contrast-associated acute kidney injury prevention. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024;37(3):388. doi:10.1080/08998280.2024.2327804. PMID:38628341.

9. Berger JR, Vazquez MA. Contrast-associated acute kidney injury: how can we do better? Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024;37(6):945-946. doi:10.1080/08998280.2024.2405950. PMID:39440092.

10. Li Y, Wang J. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a review of definition, pathogenesis, risk factors, prevention and treatment. BMC Nephrol. 2024;25:140. doi:10.1186/s12882-024-03570-6. PMID:38649939.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-25

How to Cite

1.
D GP, J JM, M N, S G. Pharmacological Considerations in Diagnostic Radiology: Contrast Agents, Adverse Reactions, Drug–Imaging Interactions, And Patient Safety. JAHCRI [Internet]. 2026 Sep. 25 [cited 2026 Oct. 10];1(3):93-104. Available from: https://jahcri.com/index.php/jahcri/article/view/44

Similar Articles

11-14 of 14

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.